Rogue Supreme Court Ignores Constitutional Boundaries

11 February 2015 AD

SCOTUS moves toward legitimizing “gay marriage” in America by ruling against the People of Alabama.

Background

One could say the issue of unlawful “gay marriage” began in 2006, when Alabama voters approved a constitutional amendment banning the abhorrent practice. The issue today isn’t “gay marriage” but federal overreach. The 50 states, separately or collectively, have the power to allow or disallow gay marriage, not federal government.

Of the thirty enumerated powers granted federal government by the states, the authority to define marriage, thereby defining the American family, or the authority to define any other societal constructs was not among those constitutional powers.

As stated clearly and unambiguously in the Tenth Amendment:

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

“Reserved to the states” is the operative phrase. We the People, through agency of our respective states, did not and do not assign authority to redefine the ancient institution of family, marriage of one man and one woman, to federal government.

On the matters of separation of powers between federal and state governments, Thomas Jefferson said,

I believe the States can best govern our home concerns, and the General Government our foreign ones.

Issue of the Hour: Will Federal Government Reach Beyond Constitutional Boundaries?

Two Supreme Court Justices, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, openly state their opposition to the Court’s unconstitutional encroachment on the rights of the states.

Actionable

Let’s do our duty. Let’s demand our Representatives remove any and all Supreme Court justices from office who rule against the people of Alabama.

Regarding the seating of justices on federal courts, the President nominates, but it is the Legislative Branch that has sole authority to seat them or to remove them. Any federal judge can be removed by Congress when his or her conduct is judged inconsistent with “good behaviour”.

Article III, Section 1

The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.

Congressional Contact Information for Texas Fourth District

Senator John Cornyn contact information

Email: http://www.cornyn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=contactform

517 Hart Senate Office Bldg.
Washington, DC 20510
Main: 202-224-2934
Fax: 202-228-2856

Senator Ted Cruz contact information

Email: http://www.tedcruz.org/contact-us/

185 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-5922

Congressman John Ratcliffe contact information

Email: https://ratcliffe.house.gov/contact

6531 Horizon Road
Suite A
Rockwall, TX 75032
Phone: (972) 771-0100
Fax: (972) 771-1222

John White
Rockwall, Texas

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s